WTF? OMG! BBQ!

I have been quite active in a few Scientology-related forums lately. And the experience has been rather disturbing.

I have for years followed the FreeZone e-mail list, Marty Rathbun’s blog, the predominantly anti-Scientology forums ESMB and WWP, and since recently, several Scientologist groups on Facebook.

Wherever there are discussions on Scientology, polarity and irrationality ensues. That is well known. But my experiences over the past few weeks have uncovered another facet.

First my conclusion: Whatever Scientology touches, it tends to corrupt. A disturbingly large portion of Scientologists discussing on the Net can be characterized as overly emotional, dead serious and jumping to conclusion without supporting facts. Group-think or “group-belief” is the order of the day. I tell you, it’s crazy in the closed pro-Scientology groups. You won’t see it unless you are especially invited. So consider this my report from the front.

If you follow my blog, you know that I am relentless on my quest for truth. Fact is King, and I am not applauding emotional rants, logical fallacies or intellectual dishonesty. I discuss with people to continually mold my views. I like how others inspire me to change my mind and uncover more truth. I am happy to be proven wrong. Because that constitutes progress.

I cross-posted “Conclusion: There are no Clears” to both the main Indie group on Facebook and the FreeZone mailing list. I also asked why the OT material should be confidential. Both were met with outrage, heat and lots of rah-rah. One guy even objected effusively, on and on, to my post on Clears while admitting he didn’t actually read the post, just the heading.

Lots of name-calling and violent opposition to even neutral questions. And it’s not only opposition to my posts, it is opposition to anyone not toeing the party-line. Just like in the CoS. I have even witnessed outright witch-hunts and lynch-mobs without the group basing the outrage on facts.

All this emotional outbursts and outrage happens right in the groups that have had the most training and auditing to keep their cool in any given situation. This does not serve as a good reference for the efficacy of the Scientology technology outside of the Scientology bubble or Trueman show.

It wouldn’t be disturbing if discussions went haywire on the HPforum, Linux Kernel lists or the EFF lists. But on the groups that tout the best mental regimen on the planet that creates the most enlightened and rational people? The elite of the mind? The fact is – no other discussion groups I am involved in on the Net are this aberrated.

Challenge a Scientologist’s core belief and watch the volcanoes erupt.

I left that Indie group on Facebook. I have asked to be taken off the FreeZone mailing list. I am on a quest for more enlightenment, rationality and truth, not emotional garbage and cult think.

I am so happy to be hosting this blog and have you guys contribute here. I love diverging viewpoints. You light up my day.

But I am guilty of being too harsh in discussions on this blog. I can see how I have let my self be hardened by Scientology, and I don’t like it. I will try to soften up and be more kind. Anette is already helping me in this regard. I would be grateful if you can help me achieve this. I am a work in progress.

*Hugs*

lennon

From Wog to Scientologist and back to one’s own path

  1. This Scientology thing may be interesting. But there is a lot of bad press about this. I will give it a try.
  2. Wow! This communications course really works. Scientology makes a lot of sense. The media has got this one wrong.
  3. Scientology really has got the answers! Hubbard was a genius. I am a Scientologist.
  4. Everything I have experienced so far is 100% right. The rest of Scientology must surely also be right
  5. Scientology is the One True Path to Total Freedom, the only hope for Man.
  6. The Church of Scientology is saving Mankind. David Miscavige is the most dedicated, brilliant leader there is. I follow Command Intention to the letter.
  7. There is something wrong in the Church that I can’t quite put my finger on.
  8. The Church is not applying Hubbard’s policy correctly. And there is out-tech. This is a local phenomenon.
  9. There seem to be global issues with the Church. It is not expanding even though Miscavige says it is expanding like never before.
  10. Scientology is the Only True Path, but the current management is not on that path. It has betrayed Hubbard.
  11. I am a dedicated Scientologist, and I can no longer support a suppressive Church. I’m out!
  12. I am an Independent Scientologist. I practice my religion outside of the confinement of the CoS.
  13. There sure are lots of diverging viewpoints among independent Scientologists. But I have my own unassailable trust in Hubbard.
  14. Maybe the insanities in the Church did not start with Miscavige. Maybe, just maybe some of the problems originated with Hubbard.
  15. Hmm… maybe Hubbard wasn’t right about everything. Maybe there actually are other valid spiritual paths
  16. Heck, Hubbard was wrong about a lot of things. Crap! My stable data are experiencing an earthquake.
  17. Scientology is a tool like so many tools out there. It’s got its good and its bad. I will use whatever works.
  18. I don’t really care one way or the other. I am on my own path toward my own goals.

Not exactly my journey, but close. Although some flip to the opposite and go from fanatic to anti-fanatic, I see most people go through a similar list to the above. It may serve as a useful prediction.

http://ergocakes.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/the-path/

Brendan & Geir does the US

Å (the company of Brendan and myself) is looking at a US Tour from June 15th through the 22nd.

We’ll be visiting NY, LA and a stop-over at Chris’ somewhere in the middle to see the Grand Canyon and discuss the universe and stuff.

We’d like our tour to matter. We’d like to meet with interesting people, be inspired, make new friends and have a blast.

If you’ve got some cool or crazy ideas, want to have a coffee with us, set up a seminar, do a fun project or just exchange jokes, please let us know. We’re open for anything.

Brendan Geir

Hugs!

We can protest. We can rally against an irrelevant cult. We can debate lots of what-ifs and rail against gun control laws. Or we can do something effective right here and now.

We can start by giving hugs. Lots of hugs. Hug those closest to you. Then some friends. Then some strangers.

Try this: Hug two strangers tomorrow. Let me know how it worked out. I will report back on my hugging adventure. In the meantime:

Working with people with drive

Just got off the phone with a nice guy. We talked about helping people, and particularly about helping brainwashed people inside the Church of Scientology. And I told him what people I prefer to help these days.

Just a few months ago, I would get fired up about trying to help people “see the truth” or “wake up”. No longer.

While I appreciate other’s effort in helping a person wake up from a brainwashed daze, I find my own interest in such waning.

I prefer to work with those who have a drive rather than those who try their best to keep the status quo.

And it doesn’t matter where that “drive” leads – as long as the person really wants to change and reach some goal, I am all in. My interest and ability to help people with a drive is high, and that’s where I will focus.

Drop sales

If you are selling products or services that you need to convince the customers to buy, you are doing something wrong. Either sell something else or figure out why the customers aren’t running down your doors to get what you are offering.

Brendan had a week earlier this winter where he didn’t convince anyone about anything. That got me thinking. And I decided to at least stop pushing products or services on people. Market and present, yes. But using effort, no.

I figure it’s much smarter to present something that customers really, really want. And then deliver that better than they expected. Push is a sign of failure.

selling

Kill PR

While there are many valuable definitions and purposes of “Public Relations”, these are the ones I would like to see killed:

Communication by a person or an organization with the purpose of creating a favorable public image; commonly referred to as PR.” (Wiktionary)

The business of inducing the public to have understanding for and goodwill toward a person, firm, or institution.” (Mirriam-Webster)

I don’t want others to have any other impression of me than the correct impression of me. Not slanted, not puffed up, not embellished.

I would rather have an honest impression of a company than a PR impression. I want to see honesty and transparency in business, not favorable images.

Transparency rules.

And I think the best goodwill you can create is the goodwill based on raw honesty.